Fwd: SUPPLEMENT TO "WE ARE ALL SUJECTS NOT CITIZENS NOW

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Nov 9, 2009 5:38 pm
Subject: Fwd: SUPPLEMENT TO "WE ARE ALL SUJECTS NOT CITIZENS NOW

Editor's Note: It has been brought to  the attention of rickcosmos that individuals have found it impossible to become followers or members or to leave comments at the five websites due to a technical difficulty: A missing step in the process of setting up the sites which we are unable to rectify at this time. We recommend that you send comments and other material to rrdd3939@aol.com We have reason to believe (it varies from site to site) that we receive 15 to 60 hits per week. groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic has been inactive save to advertise other websites will now be active and you will be able to become a member there and also indicate which other sites you follow. We will be in a position to more accurately gauge how many hits we're receiving.                                                                                                                                                         :                        ARTICLE: WE ARE ALL SUBJECTS NOT CITIZENS NOW!                                                                                                                                                                                              SUPPLEMENT: CASE FOR MARSHAL LAW NOT IMPEACHMENT                                Editor's Note: It's imperative that you read or reread or at least glance at: :"WE ARE ALL SUBJECTS NOT CITIZENS NOW" and "HERE'S WISHING YOU A DREARY CHRISTMAS" and the "TRIUMVIRATE" series. Less you think rickcosmos (aka Richard DePersio) has taken complete leave of his senses; some of you have probably thought that for a long time. Those articles serve as a foundation which for many, perhaps, most will justify my proposition.Before, you label me a right-wing nut: I have the law on my side and wait to you read what the third highest ranking democrat has to say.                                                                                                                                  I              was             a                                                                                                                                                      Super-Patriot once.                                                          What seems                                   likes years        of an Obama presidency those days have fading to black.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Constitutional/Contract/Bankruptcy/Property Laws: President Bush stretched but did not violate '1 law' , 12 times (it may have fell under more then one of the four categories listed)with congressional support toward the end of his presidency;                                                     President Obama BROKE '1 law', 12 times (it could fall under more then one area)by Executive Order without congressional support and BROKE six more 'laws' (falling under one or more classes) again by Executive Order;                                                                                    The House broke 2 laws and 2 House procedures;                                                              The Senate 1 law and 1 Senate procedure (They are a disgrace; they must try harder!). (I listed all the infractions in previous articles).                                                                                                        This was the scoreboard until last week. According to Dr.David Janda, author, "The Awakening of a Surgeon," one of the many items passed  in the so-called 'Stimulus Package'  by Congress and signed by the president in February having nothing to do with stimulus was a provision calling for government medical rationing. The president, congressional democrats and the liberal media have told us that there is no rationing in healthcare reform and they were technically telling the truth - it was already in the stimulus bill that members of congress didn't read. There were laws approving eugenics in 35 states between 1905 and 1935 though rarely enforced and were eventually deemed unconstitutional. What was approved in the 'Stimulus Bill' would fall under the category of eugenics though different then the ones in force early in the last century. If and when implemented by the executive branch it will probably call for government bureaucrats to play God. Priority One: 15 to 45 years olds will be christened the most valuable members of society and 1) if there is a shortage of a drug it will have to be given to that age group first and if there is any leftovers to people of other ages and 2) if a 30 year old and a 60 need a liver transplant, it will have to be given to the 30 year old and 3) Triage (the treating of patients in the order of the severity of their condition) will be modified by the 15-45 factor. The decision will be taken away from the Chief of O.R. in consultation with the Chief Surgeon, the House physician, one of the hospital administrators and the head nurse (of course, consultation isn't always indicated but should be a medical  not a government  descision.UPDATE: ADD ONE MORE  ILLEGAL VIOLATION TO BOTH THE PRESIDENT AND THE CONGRESS!!!                                                                             The healthcare bill just passed will force people to get health insurance and punish             those who fail to do so. You might say - it will save taxpayers money but notice the words: force, health and punish and think of the term: individual liberty .Violations galore.They might come to think that they have the power to tell you what kind of car that you can drive and what you can eat!UPDATE: ADD ONE MORE VIOLATION TO HOUSE!!!                                                    The president is determining the salaries and benefits of top executives at companies and banks that received government loans which he illegally translated into virtual stocks.He's even determing salaries of executives at some companies and banks which didn't take a penny of taxpayer money.Does this constitute one of the Constitutional powers enumerated in the Constitution for the president?I think not! You might think that curbing executive compensation is a good thing. So what! The law: stockholders choose a board of directors who choose a chairman of the board (have you noticed that over the past 15 or so years, they've wanted the second title of CEO; it reminds me of movie directors, by 1940 or thereabouts the director's name appeared last in the opening credits - prior to that it was about 75% of the time and then about 20 years ago he wanted his name to appear twice - the second or third credit as a John Smith film - - rare prior to then - - - did I just go off on an ADD tangent!?) and they - confused? - board of directors determine his compensation, he in turn hires the president (and COO!) and the president puts a price on the senior vice-presidents and comptroller (and CFO!)who takes charge from there.He illegally made himself a bankruptcy judge so unions didn't have to make concessions. Why doesn't he determine what goes in the wallets of unions bosses?UPDATE: THE PRESIDENT BREAKS THE LAW AGAIN!!!                                                                               The federal government partially funds the "National Endowment of the Arts"                         and is telling creative artists to create artwork supporting his policies - that's a legal no-no! UPDATE: PRESIDENT CONTINUES TO USE CONSTITUTION AS TOILET PAPER!                           As a constructionalist, I deem semi-independent government agencies like Fannie Mae      and Freddie Mac to be unconstitional. The Founding Father's didn't want agencies or bureaus or commissions to be half way in and half way out of the executive branch. They wanted everything to be smack dab inside one of the three branches of the Federal government - that's not Obama's fault.(I don't blame everything on Obama: just the other day, I stubbed my toe and I didn't blame him; unconstitutional measures were passed by progressives, 1990-1920, 1934-1944).President Clintion, Senator Barney Frank, ACorn, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the semi-independent Federal Reserve Bank and the semi-independent Securities and Exchange commission are largely responsible for the economic/financial crisis. The unions destroyed the auto industry and so what does your president do? He puts the union in charge of GM. Fannie and Freddie deal with mortgages - now he's going to make them landlords - they will be renting houses and apartments. Illegal - perhaps; stupid - definitely. UPDATE: I JUST DECIDED TO ADD STUPIDITY TO THE OBAMA LIST!!!                                                                                            Watergate a cover-up of a break in(some say: dirty politics or political shenanigans)         looks like child's play and Iran/contra which was largely successful, well, I think that the Founding Father's would cut presidents some constitutional slack when it comes to directly or indirectly protected America via defense policy, foreign policy and national security - a little slack. George, Tom and Jim would approve of Reagan and Bush's actions. Nixon, Reagan and Bush were Republicans.                                                                                                                   On the other hand, Clinton had 5 affairs and lied about one under oath, Travel-gate, Whitewater, FBI-gate, magically disappearing and reappearing subpoenaed documents, and the China-Connection - it was only investigated superficially and had to do with Mr. Green (Al Gore) at a Buddhist Temple and claiming not knowing why he was there and the sale of nuclear technology to China and illegal campaign contributions - - - if the spam hits the fan on that one it could turn out that democrat Clintion was a TRAITOR!!!                                                                       RECENTLY, FORMER  JUDGE NAPOLIANO ASKED  JAMES CULBURN,                        THE THIRD   HIGHEST RANKING DEMOCRAT IN THE HOUSE-THE WHIP, WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION DOES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GET AUTHORITY TO REGULATE HEALTHCARE (By the way, it happened on a large scale once before: democrat president Johnson and a democratically-controlled congress as part of the failed and still with us Great Society social programs) AND THE DEMOCRAT RESPONDED "MOST OF WHAT CONGRESS HAS BEEN DOING THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS IS IGNORING THE CONSTITUTION." I never thought it was possible. And they are doing it in front of you and most of you are too stupid and lazy to find out. They have plans to take control of the internet and seize partial ownership and full control of many corporate farms -can you say: soviet collective farm? This is 100% unconstitutional as is telling people what to drive and what to eat which they have begun to do and silly you thought that I was kidding earlier!. Liberty wanes; the nanny-state takes care of you and makes decisions for you from cradle to grave. You wake up to discover that the words freedom, justice, liberty, equality have been redacted from the the dictionary and you better make sure that an Obama unconstitutional czar doesn't  hear you utter those words. The word Tyranny will loom large in your lexicon. Impeachment? The donkeys control congress and are co-conspirators                                                                                                                           In third world nations, when there is a military coup the military never voluntarily returns power to the people and/or a civilian government. I can't believe what I'm about to say: I want the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to declare Marshal Law before Commander-in-Chief Obama does. THE CHARGE: REPLACING THE FOUNDING FATHER'S FEDERALIST/CONSTRUCTIONALISTS CONSTITUTION PREDICATED ON JUDEO-CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES AND CAPITALIST/FREE MARKET CONCEPTS with the progressive 'living' constitution based on secularism and socialism if not communism. The American soldier loves the country they voluntarily serve and take an oath to upheld the Constitution. I can't believe what I am saying: I'M CALLING UPON THE MILITARY TO COMMIT AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACT FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESTORING THE CONSTITUTION AND I HAVE NO FEAR THAT THEY WILL QUICKLY RESTORE CIVIL:IAN AUTHORITY ONCE THEIR MISSION IS COMPLETED .REMEMBER: WE ARE TALKING ABOUT AN AMERICAN SOLDIER!