Fwd: The Cosmos of Rick...

-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Tue, Feb 28, 2012 7:17 pm
Subject: The Cosmos of Rick...

                            The Cosmos of Rick: Odd Couple - Adam and Kevin

                         by Richard DePersio (Citizen Journalist is still missing

                                                                 as we go to press)

Once again, we present arguments off of the beaten path.

Homosexuality: The religious state accurately that homo is immoral according to

the Bible and are incapable and unwilling to go further. Libs maintain that it is

simply a matter of understanding and compassion. We say: Let's examine it

scientifically.

Sociobiology: This field began to form in the 1940s; it is relatively new. Some

biochemists, geneticists, psychiatrists and psychologists think that our behavior

is largely determined genetically. You can be born with a strong homo or

criminal or nasty or greedy or etc. gene. Recently, the prestigious John Hopkins

Medical Center claimed that you can be born with a strong pedophile gene. If

you are born with a strong gene, there is a 90% that you will grow up to possess

that personality trait. Other biochemists, geneticists, etc. think that these

constitute inclinations. If you are born with a strong nasty gene, there's a

slightly better chance of your growing up to be nasty because you personality is

determined by biology/nature - 50% and environment/nurture - 50%. The latter will

ultimately determine personality. (It's one or the other).

Traditional biology: Humans have the most advanced brains, therefore, aren't slaves

of their biology; Religion would say: Humans were given free will.

Those who maintain that we are largely genetically determined are ignoring our

advanced brains and are making excuses for bad behavior. Libs contend that

criminals shouldn't be punished too severely, if at all, because they can't help

having criminal natures and that homos are born that way - as are scum peds.

What about the 50/50-ers? Why don't they drop their genes (if attractive, I want to

be present in lab when this transpires; heterosexual here). Why can't they say: we

are the result of everything that we learned in the order that we learned it; everything

that we experienced in the order that we experienced; everyone that we have known,

especially, in most cases, parents.

Although, the following might be factors: the amount of testosterone the fetus is

exposed to after 5 months gestation might determined more aggressive boys from

less aggressive boys; more aggressive girls from less - in rare cases, some nearly

 as aggressive as boys. The top of our brain is devided into two halves - boys are more

 right-hemisphered while girls left. - But we are not slaves of biology - - it might be

harder and take longer but girl can excel at r-h functions.

Traditional psychiatry/psychology: Homos is abnormal, Decades of research was

discarded like old panties in the early '80s due to pressure from the gay lobby and

feminist orgs- sacrificed at the lib alter. It was now a normal but alternate lifestyle.

How can we still consider psychiatry a medical 'science' and psychology a social

'science.'

Let's return to the idea of homos being born that way. Statement: I am saying things

that even conservative politicians are afraid to say; I am saying things that the

minority of moderate and conservative scientists are afraid to say (those that have

political positions); the religious can't and won't say - they're limited to just the

religious argument which won't suffice nowadays. More lesbos than gay-boys

want to be parents by adopting or in vitro (30%, 15% respectively), and only 5% of the

population is homo, therefore, they are...Offending with Truth and who can forget

how CJ used to describe himself: CITIZEN Your Shoot-from-the-Hop/Non-PC Cripple

JOURNALIST...they are bad mutations or freaks in evolutionary terms because only

5% and evolutionary disadvantageous" wouldn't be inclined to support survival-of-the-

species if we were faced with possible extinction.

We don't think that they were born that way. They are the byproduct of a traumatic

experience prior to the age of five or poor upbringing. They can be cured but must

strongly want it - consciously and subconsciously; must work hard at it.

Alternative: Our advanced brains are meaningless; we don't possess free will; homos

are freaks; criminals, including, peds must be treated with kid cloves.

Gov and society shouldn't be in the business of sanctioning unnatural/abnormal/immoral

behavior. They claim to be victims of verbal; and physical gay bashing - stay in the damn closet!!!

If you want to go around talking about you abborent behavior: I like boys

instead of girls; I like to be spanked; I like to be tied up. You're asking to be teased or worse.

Archie comic book introduced gay character, Kevin, who was participating in a 'gay pride'

him to tutor his stepson. Townshend would later become Chancellor of the Exchequer,

responsible a long with the king, for the notorious tax on American tea. Returning to Scotland

in 1766, he entered scholarly retirement and wrote his most famous book, "Wealth of Nations."

More downstairs: Use stairs; elevator out-of-order.

parade; later, he was spun off into his own comic. Infiltrating the world of the innocent for

the purpose of indoctrination.

Nearly twenty states are teaching first graders that all families are equal: mom/dad; two

moms; two dads; one mom; one dad; whatever else. Yet, every study over the past

fifteen years has shown that a child is best off in mom/dad household functional followed

by mom/dad dysfunctional followed by single parent functional and sing dys. It made lie out

of feminist claim: a women can do it all well - man optional. It also demonstrates how

libs will sacrifice education for brain-washing.

                                ADAM SMITH: The LIGHTER SIDE

Adam had a curious stumbling gait that a friend described as "vermicular." And. he was an

absent-minded professor. On one occasion, absorbed in discussion, he fell into a

tanning pit. A successful author, he came to the attention of Lord Townshend, who engaged