-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, Feb 8, 2012 5:44 pm
Subject: Fwd: BACK in CJ's World...
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, Feb 8, 2012 5:44 pm
Subject: Fwd: BACK in CJ's World...
BACK in CITIZEN JOURNALIST's WORLD
by Citizen Journalist with Richard DePersio
CJ: "I thought that I was too old to take up the guitar (39 like Jack Benny). I might
reconsider!
RD muses about CJ (and comes up with his own interpretation of Hopper
painting): 1) Shakespeare: "All the world's a stage and All the men and women merely
players." 2) Hawthorn: "No one can wear one face to himself and another to the
multitude without finally getting bewildered as to which may be true."
No; CJ is not a cross-dresser. Imagine male figures.
Citizen 'Crippled Communicator' Journalist: A cripple born without upper limbs was
forbidden from going on a ride at SeaWorld where at least one hand on safety bar is
required. Cripple is suing under the American Disabilities Act of 1990. SeaWorld
formulates his rules predicated on input from manufactures and safety experts. Rules
aren't frivolous but designed to protect their customers and to avoid liability law
suits.
I was hospitalized with a fractured rib in 1990. It was smoking in the lounge and
sipping brandy brought to me, upon my orders, by a younger chap. Upon leaving
lounge a nurse said: "I must have been seeing things; nobody would drink booze in
a hospital. Anyway, you must be so happy that ADA passed." I replied: "No; I
opposed it." Her face dropped. I set her straight:
I predict that it will be abused by the mental and/or physical cripples and that they
I predict that it will be abused by the mental and/or physical cripples and that they
will mess-up the able-bodied world. (I am aware of dozens of ridiculous and unreasonable
law suits levered against businesses of all sizes which cost the business money,
results in higher prices for all {worse when they win or business chooses to settle out
of court} and business might have used money to a hire a worker, perhaps, a semi-
broken person!
We live in capitalist society where free market forces should operate. What should
have happened? Fed and state govs should have recommended that businesses
accommodate these people. Perhaps, a local gov might offer a tax incentive. Let's
say that I own a small business - say, a restaurant - I should have options in a free
society. I might accommodate and secure their business. I might decide that Joe's
restaurant across the street is accommodating. There aren't that many of them in the
neighborhood - no reason that that have to have access to all restaurants in the area.
I might use my money to hire more workers; I might hire a semi-disabled.
(Remember: I'm a deist who favors school prayer. Unorthodox ideas predicated on sound
judgement).
No comments:
Post a Comment