Thursday, September 22, 2011

Fwd: THE ARTICLE (Spanking-New Version)...







-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Tue, Sep 20, 2011 10:10 am
Subject: THE ARTICLE (Spanking-New Version) (Four posts dealing with energy crisis
follow).
                             THE ARTICLE (Spanking-New Version)
                   by Citizen Journalist, Richard DePersio and Dr. Yamamoto
Richard D.: "What's on the line-up?" Citizen Journalist: "We got your tax
proposals." RD: "We have the Space Launch System." Dr. Yamamoto: "I
might be yellow but I got green."
As is our wont, we start with cosmos (which means world) and then, we
deal with world by Offending with Truth!
       NASA has proposed the Orion-MPCV/SLS (Multi-Purpose-Crew-Vehicle/
Space Launch System) building on Saturn 5/Shuttle/Constellation technology
which will conduct missions in earth orbit - a recent report had indicated
otherwise. It will place science satellites in earth orbit and visit International
Space Station for time-sensitive missions when and if private sector has to
cancel due to technical difficulties - a back-up. However, its primary mission
will be to Mars. Unfortunately, not to the moon as well. Moon mining would
drastically improve our energy situation - see: "Action Chain Letter 10 and
"Moon Mining: Crystalinks" at our comsat Citizenj (connect via Home Page)
 and then phone and/or leave a
message at the web site of your members of congress. Get with the program!!!
It was over 15 years ago when Ross Peroit warned us about deficit-spending
and the national debt and few took him seriously. It was over 10 years ago
that Steve Forbes popularized the idea of a flat tax. Over the past few months,
Herman Cain and Citizen Journalist have been talking about a fair/flat taxes.
We are now prepared to present our final version:
Part One: A flat tax of 10% for those who earn over $50,000 per year (Thanks
to Bush those who earn less than $50,000 no longer have to pay a federal
income tax; they have a state in America and, we believe, that they should
pay a mere $100 to help reduce the debt). Everyone - super-rich, rich, upper-
middle-class, mid-middle-class and a portion of lower-middle class - will pay
10% of their salaries/wages; 10% of the interest on their savings accounts; 10%
of the dividends on stocks, bonds, commodities; 10% of rental income; 10% of
the sale of property; 10% on gifts, tips, gambling wins. For a long time, there
was a marriage penalty which hurt and discouraged marriage and while it has
been largely rectified, we would call for a deduction of up to 3 dependents for
the heterosexually married and a deduction for charitable donations. There
would be no other deductions: tax simplification. Everyone could fill out their
own taxes - no need to spend billions on accountants.
Part Two: Fair Tax or National Income Tax of 10% except for poor, elderly and
disabled who have a Benefit Card and a Photo I.D.
Cutting taxes and rolling back regulations unleashes productive forces: people
work harder, earn more and, thereby, pay more in taxes - we won't mind because
we are making more. This alone won't eliminate debt or even come close as
Medicaid/Medicare and other social programs will consume all tax revenue in
about 20 years and we won't have any money for defense, national and domestic
security, NASA and other fed responsibilities!
"When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific
journal, show a 'huge discrepancy' between alarmist climate models and
real world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials
would be wise to take note." - James Taylor, Heartland Institute.
In contrast: U.N./Al Gore/liberal science: Infamous hockey stick graph;
suppressing opposing points of view; lack of peer review in prominent
journals dealing with climate-ology, atmospheric physics; placing heat
sensors near heat sources; emails amongst U.N. scientists containing
suggestions on how to fudge data; papers in scientific journals quoting
other papers is fine but quoting from "Mountain Climbing" and "Camping
mags isn't - "National Geographic," "Scientific American," "Discover,"
Science Digest" would be considered borderline by most reputable
scientists. As our society becomes more scientific and technological, it is
imperative that our children learn real science not fabrications regarding
global warming/climate change!
Know you enemies: the liberals. This includes that strange breed: upper
and middle management at most T.V. networks, most major newspapers,
all major movie studios and record companies, most publishing houses.
They are capitalists but social (moral) liberals, liberals on domestic issues
(other than economics), liberals on defense and foreign policy.
       During and before the early 1980s, 70% of Americans considered
homosexuality to be immoral. abnormal and unnatural. The issue of same-
sex marriage was virtually never brought up. The remaining 30% considered
it to be a normal but alternate lifestyle or were undecided. Nowadays,
polls show that 51% favor same-sex marriage when there choice is same-
sex marriage or not. When the civil union option is added to the mix, the
preference is 60% for civil unions (most people are too stupid to realize
that they are both the self-same thing - it's just a matter of semantics).
Although, we would likely discover that it is 65-75% in the 14 Northeastern
and 3 western states and 51-65% opposed in the Midwest and South.
Nonetheless, very significant change since the early '80s. What happened?
       Only 20% of Americans identify themselves as liberals and 12% as
atheists and agnostics. Libs are amoral or moral relativists: they
believe that each person should decide right-wrong/good-bad for
themselves without any consideration given to the Bible or what the
majority in a society think (a recipe for choas not society!). We can thank
the perverted liberal daytime talk shows (Phil, Oprah, Joan, Sally, Montel
and the rest of the slime) since the early '80s wherein homo was their
favorite topic (an audience member who was critical was sometimes
shouted down by the host or made to shut up with a "We don't pass
judgement here." Libs are big on free speech; we hear you laughing!
Often the freaks appeared: for a few years, viewers were shocked and
wanted to upchuck followed by a few years of disgust followed by a
few years of uneasiness followed by a few years of tentative acceptance
and, finally, for many: it's a normal but alternate lifestyle - not for me
but acceptable. Fag flags fly high on fairy fannies (you know about our
penchant...addiction...to alliterations!).
(Economic/financial crisis due in large part to barney frank's fannie and
freddie - are we on A.D.D. trip!; be patient for there will be our customary
A.D.D. break).
       Now, shows like NGC's "Taboo" and TLC's "My Strange Addiction"
are working on further damaging masculinity with man-babies. Shows
about sadists, adults who dress like animals and people with all kinds
of fetishes that they hope to mainstream. They no longer need to focus
on homos reason their flags are flying high. Our candidate for the main
 flavor for the next two decades is: man-babies.
It's time for an A.D.D. break brought to you by Adderall and Gallo Wines:
There are over a 160 types of cancer; 40% of us will be diagnosed as having
cancer in our lifetime.
We are facing a double-dip recession or stagflation: rising prices (rising
inflation)and inadequate growth; during prosperity prices are high and no
one complains because demand is meeting supply (little inflation: problem
when demand exceeds supply and prices rise), unemployment is low,
raises and bonuses are large, companies are expanding (new factories),
spending more on R & D, dividends are very healthy.
Starting next year under Obama-care, health insurances companies will have
to cover birth control pills and other preventative measures and an annual
physical for women without a co-pay; these are just two of the hundreds of
new regs that will prevent health insurers from making a decent profit and
result in there going out of business paving the way for socialized medicine.
Let's not forget the hundreds of new regs that will soon take effect due to
Financial Reform forcing business to expand factories and built new
factories in countries with lower taxes and fewer regs. The loss of jobs will
mean more Americans on social services, fed gov will have to spend more on
 dependent citizens. Are you worried about U.S. loosing Triple A bond rating.
We might go all the way down to junk bond status.
We were remiss: Obama-care will eliminate 12% of the plans offered by health
insurers. (See our health plan:Updated-Modified-Expanded"Action Chain Letter 10"
The union myth (it too is being taught to your children): The significant growth
of the middle class in the 19th Century, especially, between the end of the
Civil War (do you know  when it ended or are you ignorant?) and 1900 was due
to unions forcing big bad business which treated employees like servants (look
at your kid's elementary or high or college textbook) to increase wages 3-fold
during that period. Problem: by 1900, only 3% of Americans were in unions!
Unions helped save America by pressuring FDR to do the "New Deal." FDR's
Secretary of the Treasury stated in 1939 that "New Deal" predicated on Keynesian
economics (the same economics employed by Obama for two years) failed!
Unions are responsible for forcing those Robber Barons to institute safety in the
work place. Truth: Modern public relations began during the early 20th Century.
Execs became concerned with public image and realized that it looked bad to
have a lot of workers take ill or become injured; further, they had an investment
in worker's that they trained: an asset. Safety began to improve early in the last
century and big-time between 1933-71. Unions advocated for but didn't get
National Safety Board until 1977. Prior to the 1960s, it was difficult for blacks to
join a union and they were even precluded for certain occupations. "Look for the
Union Label" meant: made by whites. Yet, they claim and your children's teachers
teach that unions were always pro-black. Unions utter ugly untruths. (There we go
again! - alliterating).
*Finest Kind Pediatric Hospital and Whorehouse
                  Dedicated to the Memory of Richard Hooker.


Fwd: ATBTC's CHAIN LETTER 4 (Latest Update)





-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Thu, Sep 22, 2011 10:08 pm
Subject: Fwd: ATBTC's CHAIN LETTER 4 (Latest Update
                       Looking Back-Truncated-Updated-Modified
 (Originally called Action Chain Letter 4; read original version at this venue)
                          by Citizen Journalist and Richard Depersio
(Two posts follow: 1)Cystalinks (wacky web site except for recommended post): Click: Science;
Click: Astronomy; Click: Moon; Click: Mining. Accurate except for end; it would be cost-
effective. 2) Following post indicates China and Russia plan to mine moon in ten years).
Preidential candidate Citizen Journalist: More Proposals Original/Proposals
Endorsed than Obama and all Republican candidates.
We propose using future operational-version of AF X-37B coupled with future  super heavy-
lifter to back-up and, eventually, replace aging GPS (Geo Positioning Satellites) System.
Mining the moon for silicon and He-3 would go a long way toward solving our energy crisis.
Energy generated would far FAR exceed the cost of missions. This constitutes a highly cost
effective proposal.
Originally published Tues, Nov 23, 2010; it had been updated, expanded and improved on
7-26-2011 and 9/22
PROPOSAL 10:Mining the Moon for Silicon and Helium-3 for the
purpose of taking a major step toward energy independence and
generating affordable energy while our demand for energy more
then doubles over the next two decades.
      We have taken many factors into consideration in endorsing
 these proposals, including, real climatology as opposed to
 U.N.-Cattle Fart-Hockey Stick Pseudo-climatology.
      It is extremely expensive and difficult to mine for silicon and
Helium-3 on earth. The price tag might even be prohibitive on a
massive scale. Silicon is employed in producing solar cells for
solar panels which we want in earth orbit generating electricity.
Helium-3 would be used for fusion plants to generate electricity.
We presently have fission plants. Fusion  plants would be less
expensive, even safer and more environmentally-friendly (for the
 benefit of Cattle-Farters) than fission plants. Fusion technology
underdevelopment. NASA could accelerate process by working on
nuclear thermal propulsion.
     Let's put the subject in perspective. Coal generates 15-20% as
much energy as put into the energy of mining and processing.
Mining on the moon is much less expensive because of lower
gravity and no air resistance. "Mass Drivers" powered by
 concentrated sunlight would scrape helium-3 and silicon from the
surface and would deliver the material to earth (He-3) and orbit
 (silicon). It would cost only 5% to send silicon from moon to earth
orbit than it  would from earth to earth orbit. Such mining would
 retrieve 300x more energy  from He-3 then put in, including, the
energy   of going to the moon and shipping material to earth! 
Cost-effective:
It would be less expensive to use He-3 from moon than from earth
in nuclear fusion plants; it would be cheaper and more effective
to have orbiting solar panel satellites as opposed to solar
 panel stations on earth.So, Why did Obama cancel moon program?
Same reason that he loaned Mexican Oil  to drill in Gulf of Mexico during 
moratorium on U.S. drilling, in spite of the
fact that they have much lower safety and environmental standards?
Air Force has been testing 'secret' unmanned X-37B which resembles a
space shuttle. A year ago, we were probably the first to propose placing
future operational version near GPSs in order to move them out
of harm's way in the event that an enemy fires a missiles at them
for the purpose of crippling our communications, especially, military.
Further, upgraded GPS should be housed in cargo bay ready to
replace aging GPS when it dies. Unmanned X-37B is more
maneuverable from ground than a regular satellite. In addition, we
proposed calling operational-version "Constitution" to drive libs crazy.
It is suspected that a manned version is in the works. A
declassified-version - notice: new, original proposal coming -
should be employed by NASA to construct framework for
solar energy collecting devices which would transmit
concentrated sunlight to earth for conversion to electricity.
Framework complete, it becomes a private sector endeavor.
 Don't touch pristine moon. We'll get to it. Hold your farts. 
    It has been estimated that we will have fusion plants by 3030 give
or take 3 years. NASA could truncate it to 2025 give or take 3 years.
PROPOSAL 11: Develop heavy-lifter with nuclear thermal  stage
( aka earth-transfer
module to moon and Mars)  to      be fired  in low or high earth orbit
with it doing double-duty (magnitized and surrounding ) MPV
(new-version Orion)as cosmic ray shield for MPV (if feasible).  
We must keep in mind that we are recommending the use of
  nuclear thermal stage would make rocket faster, more powerful and
less expensive. It would also require one or two chemical stages. Project
NERVA (1962-73) would have created a nuclear thermal stage by 1978
for proposed Mars mission - the Saturn 5 third stage would have
been replaced with a nuclear thermal stage and called Saturn S-N.
PROPOSAL 12: We should have 5 moon missions - lasting 3 weeks at
lunar equatorial region, mission to lunar 'arctic' region for 5 weeks,
flight to lunar 'antarctic' circle for 7 weeks, visit to lunar
far side for 4 weeks with comsat in La grange orbit and a return to lunar
north for 3 months during 2020-21. Four follow-up missions if warranted.
     NASA would establish 3 moon bases where astronauts (Commander, 
pilot, mission specialists - geologists, geophysicists, engineers,
astronomers) for stays of up to 3 months with private company geologists,
 geophysicists, metallurgists, engineers
nearby. They would pay NASA to be flown to moon or pay private company.
They might be able to use water at poles to drink, separate out O to breath
and the H for nuclear thermal power plant and for propulsion. Living off the
 land. Mining can't commence until area is thoroughly studied scientifically.
 During that period, private company can determine
viability of site for mining. In the future, it would be in the financial interest
 of a private company to do exploration prior to exploitation without NASA.
 Pure science often leads  to applied science or technology).
The Mars mission would employ the thermal nuclear stage a.k.a. earth
transfer module and what is learned in the process of upgrading
NERVA (nuclear stage development which had been successfully tested)
 and the blueprints of the never built Saturn S-N might be applicable to the
 development of nuclear fusion plants.

  













Fwd: rrdd39@aol.com has shared: Mining the Moon - Crystalinks





-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd39 <rrdd39@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Thu, Sep 22, 2011 9:50 pm
Subject: rrdd39@aol.com has shared: Mining the Moon - Crystalinks

Mining the Moon - Crystalinks
Source: crystalinks.com

As man moves out into space - eventually resources will be sought on other planets and satellites. We look to Mars or the Moon as the perhaps the best places to find many of the natural resources we are using up on the physical planet. Given the current state of Earth-to-orbit boost technology, it is neither economical nor environmentally friendly to use rockets to loft the enormous volume of materials from the Earth's surface to build structures of the size of solar power satellites and space c...
 
rrdd39@aol.com sent this using ShareThis.

Fwd: Mining the Moon - Technology Review





-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Thu, Sep 22, 2011 9:14 pm
Subject: Mining the Moon - Technology Review

Fwd: MOTIVATE...




-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, Sep 7, 2011 3:51 pm
Subject: MOTIVATE...

From the Desk of Citizen Journalist: It is our profound hope that are articles
in general and our specific proposals (science/technology, politics, economics,
government, social policy, etc.) help motivate you to contact the White House,
government departments and agencies, your representatives in congress, your
governor, state representatives, county execs, mayors, councilmen.
       Politicians do pay attention to phone calls and messages left at their
websites (staff members: keep a tally on pros and cons; report most interesting
statements to and some times put their bosses on the phone). Why? They
know that the kind of person who takes the time to contact them is the kind of
person who is likely to vote.
 Capital Operator: 202-224-3121. When you call, you don't have to know your
senator's or congressman's name to secure their phone# but you do have to know
the name of the state in which you live! You can also request the names and
phone #s of the chairman and ranking members of committees that particularly
interest you. Phone and/or email.
 Some important members of congress that we recommend that you contact:
shelby.senate.gov/public (202-224-5744, R-Alabama), Nelson (202-224-5274, D-
Florida), Sprat, Ryan, Rubio; conrad.house.gov/public, Greg, Bishop, Richmond,
Yarmouth, Rivera.
 
Also enjoy at this location: "Looking Back/Truncated/Updated/Modified," "Action
Chain Letters," "Goodbye*Farewell*Amen," "...atmospheric, as well as metabolic
conditions..." and a lot more.